Pankaj Mishra's hysterical diatribe in the NYT , Modi's Idea
of India (Oct 24, 2014) is typical of one-side propaganda that my book aims to
counter. Bereft of sound logic to counter Hindu Nationalists, intellectuals
like Mishra resort to exaggerating minutiae, quoting instances out of context
and projecting fringe elements as prototypes to put forward their view.
Below is an excerpt from Mishra's op-ed and an excerpt from the book Lies,lies and More Lies (second ed pub Oct 16, 2014) which is inadvertently a lucid analysis of the thought process of people like Pankaj Mishra.
Pankaj Mishra writes: " A Harvard-trained economist called Subramanian Swamy recently demanded a public bonfire of canonical books by Indian historians —..........."
Excerpt from Lies,lies and More Lies: "The Hindutva movement comprises a wide spectrum. At the
periphery are people who hold extreme views, and detractors have made every attempt to promote these extremists as representative of this philosophy. Such attempts are not only fraudulent, but dishonest for these extremists are not true representatives of the core philosophy and do not reflect the majority view.
Amartya Sen, the Nobel Laureate (no fan of Hindutva) concedes
this point in The Argumentative Indian (p.53): " . . . while the hard core of “Hindutva” advocates is
relatively small, around them cluster a very much larger group, whom I will call “proto-Hindutva” enthusiasts. They are typically less zealous than the Hindutva champions and are opposed to violence in general (and are typically put off by it) . . . .
Below is an excerpt from Mishra's op-ed and an excerpt from the book Lies,lies and More Lies (second ed pub Oct 16, 2014) which is inadvertently a lucid analysis of the thought process of people like Pankaj Mishra.
Pankaj Mishra writes: " A Harvard-trained economist called Subramanian Swamy recently demanded a public bonfire of canonical books by Indian historians —..........."
Excerpt from Lies,lies and More Lies: "The Hindutva movement comprises a wide spectrum. At the
periphery are people who hold extreme views, and detractors have made every attempt to promote these extremists as representative of this philosophy. Such attempts are not only fraudulent, but dishonest for these extremists are not true representatives of the core philosophy and do not reflect the majority view.
Amartya Sen, the Nobel Laureate (no fan of Hindutva) concedes
this point in The Argumentative Indian (p.53): " . . . while the hard core of “Hindutva” advocates is
relatively small, around them cluster a very much larger group, whom I will call “proto-Hindutva” enthusiasts. They are typically less zealous than the Hindutva champions and are opposed to violence in general (and are typically put off by it) . . . .